[Bug middle-end/35346] Scalar replacement -- handling of conditional generator -- missing

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-29 06:15 -------
Hmm:
MEM[symbol: b, index: ivtmp.27, step: 4, offset: 4294967292]

Why do we produce a step and an offset when they cancel?

If we change the store to a[i+1] to be unconditional, predictive commoning does
the correct thing.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2008-04-07 01:37:59         |2008-12-29 06:15:08
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35346