[Bug c++/37898] aggregates vs. defaulted deleted functions

bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Dec 4 03:44:00 GMT 2008



------- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-04 03:41 -------

Yes, the default ctor is explicitly defaulted, but the copy ctor is an
(explicitly) deleted function. Deleted functions are user-defined.

Thus, this is not an aggregate.


-- 

bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           Keywords|rejects-valid               |
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37898



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list