[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-08-21 13:28 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Same thing here on i686-apple-darwin9.

But was the failures you see too introduced with r139233?
I can't tell myself because I see no test-results for
i686-apple-darwin on gcc-testresults@ (hint hint).

> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?foo
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c

If not, given the failures, I'd guess you're looking at a different bug.
(Please open a separate PR, this one will cover just the weak-related bug
matching the original description.)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170