[Bug c++/37043] fails to find operator match when constructing object on the fly

[scott at stg dot net]

------- Comment #2 from scott at stg dot net  2008-08-07 13:31 -------
Okay, so if I change:

FooBar& operator>> (const char *s,FooBar& dest)

to

FooBar operator>> (const char *s,FooBar dest)

It now compiles on both msvc and g++, but required functionality (operation
affecting existing object, not making new copy of it) is lost.

Is there some reason that using a reference to rvalue in operator>> is
disallowed in gcc and not msvc?  If so, why doesn't it fail in the A>>object;
instance where the object has already been instantiated separately?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37043