[Bug c++/23194] Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function syntax

[pinskia at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com  2007-10-02 23:59 -------
Subject: Re:  Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function
syntax

On 2 Oct 2007 23:54:04 -0000, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> ------- Comment #6 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com  2007-10-02 23:54 -------
> (From update of attachment 14287)
> >+           "function in %<%E (...)%>, e.g. %<(... ->* %E) (...)%>",
> >+           original, original);
> >       return error_mark_node;

It might be better to use %$1E (I think that is how it is done) so you
don't have to pass original twice.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194