[Bug tree-optimization/34265] Missed optimizations

rguenther at suse dot de gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Nov 29 11:13:00 GMT 2007



------- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de  2007-11-29 11:13 -------
Subject: Re:  Missed optimizations

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:

> Richard,
> 
> I am not sure to understand your patch in comment #17. I have already in
> gcc/passes.c (after your patch in comment #5):
> 
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_merge_phi);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_vrp);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_dce);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_init);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_done);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_cselim);
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_dominator);
>       /* The only const/copy propagation opportunities left after
> 
> do you mean that I should change
> 
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll);
> 
> to
> 
>       NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli);
> 
> ? I am assuming my interpretation is correct and rebuild gcc right now.

Yes, that's correct - I did too much copy&paste there :)

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list