[Bug fortran/34135] New: bind(c)
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Nov 17 14:32:00 GMT 2007
As reported by Dominique,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-11/msg00105.html
Christopher D. Rickett replied:
> (3) gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 which fails because of the warnings:
> ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _f03_com2
> ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _mycom
> ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _mycom2
> ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _singl
i submitted a patch that fixes the alignment differences for bind(c)
commons on OSX back in August (i think), but noone ever reviewed it
* * *
See the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00138.html
and the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00142.html
--
Summary: bind(c)
Bind(C): Alignment of commons wrong on OSX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code, patch
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34135
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list