[Bug middle-end/21628] GCC much slower than ICL. Lack of inlining?
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Nov 16 18:02:00 GMT 2007
------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 18:01 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Whaow, I have posted this report for a while...!!!
I guess this report fell through the cracks of bugzilla. Reporting the status
on new versions of GCC would have probably helped.
> But Since version 4.2, GCC seems to respect this attribute, at least!!!
> This was a great improvement for me, I have really waited for this feature.
OK. So this is fixed. Thanks for the report nonetheless. And sorry for the
delay.
> But honestly ICL (Intel Compiler for Windows) is still much better in
> optimisations.
But we are better in freedom. ;-)
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21628
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list