[Bug c++/11159] erroneous warning in copy ctor with virtual inheritance

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-16 13:58 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Even the text of the warning is misleading. Why "should" it be explicitly
> initialised, when the standard says it will be implicitly initialised if a
> suitable default constructor exists?
> 
> If you want to use a non-default constructor for the virtual base then you need
> to call it explicitly. But if the default constructor is what you want, why
> should you have to do extra work?
> 

I wonder as well. Removing this warning will close at least two PRs...


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-11 23:10:09         |2007-11-16 13:58:57
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11159