[Bug tree-optimization/34099] [4.3 Regression] optimizer problem

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-15 17:17 -------
I think this has been caused by the fix for PR29738.

Author: rakdver
Date: Thu Nov  9 00:09:43 2006
New Revision: 118602

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118602
Log:
        PR tree-optimization/29738
        * tree-ssa-ccp.c: Remove UNKNOWN_VAL from comments.
        (ccp_lattice_t): Remove UNKNOWN_VAL.
        (dump_lattice_value, ccp_lattice_meet, ccp_visit_phi_node):
        Do not handle UNKNOWN_VAL.
        (get_default_value): Set initial value of virtual operands to
        VARYING.
        (get_value): Always use get_default_value on uninitialized
        operands.
        (set_value_varying, surely_varying_stmt_p): New functions.
        (set_lattice_value): Do not pass argument to get_value.
        Do not handle UNKNOWN_VAL.
        (likely_value): Follow the semantics described in the comment.
        (ccp_initialize): Use surely_varying_stmt_p.  Do not mark
        phi nodes DONT_SIMULATE_AGAIN.
        (ccp_fold): Do not pass argument to get_value.
        (fold_const_aggregate_ref, visit_assignment): Ditto.  Do not
        handle UNKNOWN_VAL.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-14.c: New test.
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-15.c: New test.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |29738
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34099