[Bug c++/30822] wrong choice of overloaded template functions in recursive call

[Zarathustra at gentlemansclub dot de]

------- Comment #7 from Zarathustra at gentlemansclub dot de  2007-05-17 13:27 -------
According to my current understanding, the compiler is right not to accept the
given example code:
Name resolution at the point of instantiation does only work for dependent 
names.
Given a expression which looks like
"postfix-expression ( expression-listopt )"
"postfix-expression" is a dependent name if (and only if) some thing in 
"expression-listopt" depends on a template parameter and "postfix-expression" 
is an identifier. This holds for foo(...) but it does not hold for 
foo<...>(...) or ::foo(...). Therefore I assume the compiler behaves 
correctly. This is probably another case where the C++ standard is somehow
counterintuitive.


-- 

Zarathustra at gentlemansclub dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30822