[Bug c++/986] g++ misses warning for & on temporary

[chris at bubblescope dot net]

------- Comment #19 from chris at bubblescope dot net  2007-05-09 17:05 -------
while I agree we shouldn't produce an error here, personally I'm highly
unconvinced by your argument. If I had some code which if called would always
lead to undefined behaviour, but never called it, I would still want to be
told. By the same argument, why bother type-checking functions if we can prove
they are never called?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986