[Bug debug/23551] dwarf records for inlines appear incomplete

fche at redhat dot com gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 30 21:10:00 GMT 2007



------- Comment #15 from fche at redhat dot com  2007-03-30 22:10 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> This is basically the same as case 1 (though a constant instead of a call to
> rand()), now do we want not to prop x1 into x?  I say we always do want that
> because otherwise we get an extra assignment.

I believe the idea was to emit extra DWARF for that copy-propagation, so as to
treat the destination as a location-list-level alias of the source.  The idea
was not to inhibit the copy, just to "document it", if that is sensible &
feasible.

> Plus this issue is not a regression at all because the RTL level does the same.

(Did someone say it was?)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23551



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list