[Bug libfortran/31052] Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs past EOF
spark at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 26 15:54:00 GMT 2007
------- Comment #33 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 16:54 -------
(In reply to comment #31)
> Here is a new patch. I need someone to test on SPEC. It is very simple.
>
> Index: transfer.c
> ===================================================================
> *** transfer.c (revision 123205)
> --- transfer.c (working copy)
> *************** next_record_r (st_parameter_dt *dtp)
> *** 2228,2234 ****
> break;
> }
>
> ! if (dtp->u.p.current_unit->flags.access == ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL)
> test_endfile (dtp->u.p.current_unit);
> }
>
> --- 2228,2235 ----
> break;
> }
>
> ! if (dtp->u.p.current_unit->flags.access == ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL
> ! && !dtp->u.p.namelist_mode)
> test_endfile (dtp->u.p.current_unit);
> }
This patch doesn't break 200.sixtrack (when added on top of the Jerry's
previous patch above).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list