[Bug middle-end/31249] pseudo-optimzation with sincos/cexpi

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

------- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2007-03-20 14:03 -------
> I agree it's surprising to get user-visible effects with the
> TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS difference between the frontends, 
> but they are (supposed to) providing C99 runtime completion 
> by their runtime libraries.  And they rely on full C99 support.

Do you mean that g++ and gfortran set TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS on
their own?

If yes, the cexpi optimization should probably another condition:
what is the point to replace sin+cos by a call to a function
calling sin+cos?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249