[Bug c++/32934] No warning when creating a non const derived function from a const virtual function

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-31 21:49 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/Warning-Options.html
-Wall
    All of the above `-W' options combined. This enables all the warnings about
constructions that some users consider questionable, and that are easy to avoid
(or modify to prevent the warning), even in conjunction with macros. This also
enables some language-specific warnings described in C++ Dialect Options and
Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialect Options.

And:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html
Under:
The following -W... options are not affected by -Wall. 
....

-Woverloaded-virtual (C++ only)
    Warn when a function declaration hides virtual functions from a base class.
For example, in:

          struct A {
            virtual void f();
          };

          struct B: public A {
            void f(int);
          };


    the A class version of f is hidden in B, and code like:

          B* b;
          b->f();


    will fail to compile. 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32934