[Bug c/30475] assert(int+100 > int) optimized away

[kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #52 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-23 00:45 -------
(In reply to comment #51)
> Sure, new security checks can be written in a compliant manner.
> 
> But what plan do you suggest to find instances of non-compliant overflow
> checking in the existing body?  Think something like a whole Linux
> distribution. Something in the order of 15000 packages. Dozens of millions of
> lines of code. Any suggestion?
> 

How about http://scan.coverity.com/


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475