[Bug c/16804] Function pointer assignment/initialization (missing warning)

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 15:06 -------
Is the warning a good idea because it is a function call, so it may be a
confused call to quak, or simply because it is unsigned converted to enum ?


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804