[Bug c++/28986] Failure to diagnose overflow in constant expression

[gdr at integrable-solutions dot net]

------- Comment #7 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2007-01-02 23:33 -------
Subject: Re:  Failure to diagnose overflow in constant expression

"andrew dot stubbs at st dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| ------- Comment #6 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com  2007-01-02 14:04
-------
| (In reply to comment #5)
| > Why is this "accepts-invalid"? Shouldn't it be "diagnostic" instead? I am
| > trying to understand what is the expected output here: a warning or a
pedantic
| > error? 
| 
| Clause 5 paragraph 5 says it is "ill-formed". Therefore accepts-invalid
sounds
| right to me.

In C++, "ill-formed" implies "diagnostic is required" unless
explicitly noted otherwise. 

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28986