[Bug tree-optimization/30666] [4.3 Regression] warning: canonical types differ for identical types double __complex__ and double __complex__

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-22 12:21 -------
Dough - how is the middle-end supposed to handle this?  The case in question
get's a
  double sin(double)
and wants to build
  _Complex double cexpi(double)

It now uses tree.c:build_complex_type which seems to fix TYPE_CANONICAL in some
way.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |doug dot gregor at gmail dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666