[Bug ada/34446] gnatprep evaluating "not" operator at incorrect precidence
ronald dot pucul at l-3com dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Dec 13 23:28:00 GMT 2007
------- Comment #2 from ronald dot pucul at l-3com dot com 2007-12-13 23:28 -------
Subject: RE: gnatprep evaluating "not" operator at incorrect precidence
Sorry, I had assumed gnatprep would follow the same rules of precidence
as the ADA RM requires.
I had not known this not mixing of "not" and "and" or "or" rule was
established.(operation changed someplace between 3.3.3 and 3.4.1)
On the version included with gcc-3.3.3 the gnatprep tool performs the
evaluation for "not" operator / keyword acording to the ADA RM
precidence.
The GNAT RM on gcc.gnu.org doesn't precicely indicate one way or other
how/when "not" should be evaluated.
I'll "patch" the gcc-3.4.6 version of gnatprep for our internal use
until the 2000+ lines(approx 400 source files) not currently following
the NEW rule are modified.
Thank You for the info.
Ron Pucul -- Old/tired sftwr. eng. here @ L3 Link.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:40 AM
> To: Pucul, Ronald E. @ Link
> Subject: [Bug ada/34446] gnatprep evaluating "not" operator
> at incorrect precidence
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2007-12-13 13:39 ------- This is fixed in SVN trunk:
>
> ==============Error messages for input file: thing.in
> 1. # if not VAR_TRUE or VAR_TRUE then
> |
> >>> mixing "not" and "or" is not allowed, parentheses
> are required
>
> 5 lines: 1 error
>
>
> --
>
> sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |FIXED
> Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34446
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are
> on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34446
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list