[Bug c/33102] volatile excessively suppresses optimizations in range checks

Sat Aug 18 00:11:00 GMT 2007


------- Comment #2 from paulmck at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com  2007-08-18 00:11 -------
Hmmm...  I wasn't asking for volatile to be atomic, just for it to avoid
generating unnecessary code.


-- 

paulmck at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33102