[Bug fortran/31550] [regression] f951: segfault in fold-const.c:1963

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Apr 12 18:37:00 GMT 2007



------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-12 19:37 -------
What is really odd is that the same code (see below) is produced, with or
without the ONLY... It looks fine in either case and identical to that produced
by 4.2. *sigh*

Is this a problem with the backend?

Paul

dummy_atom_list_init_copy (this, other)
{
  int8 D.1373;
  int8 D.1372;
  struct dummy_atom[0:] * D.1371;
  int8 D.1370;
  int8 D.1369;
  struct dummy_atom[0:] * D.1368;

  D.1368 = (struct dummy_atom[0:] *) other->table.data;
  D.1369 = other->table.offset;
  D.1370 = (int8) other->nused;
  D.1371 = (struct dummy_atom[0:] *) this->table.data;
  D.1372 = this->table.offset;
  D.1373 = (int8) this->nused;
  {
    int8 D.1376;
    int8 D.1375;
    int8 S.0;

    D.1375 = other->table.dim[0].stride;
    D.1376 = this->table.dim[0].stride;
    S.0 = 1;
    while (1)
      {
        if (S.0 > (int8) other->nused) goto L.1;
        (*D.1371)[S.0 * D.1376 + D.1372] = (*D.1368)[S.0 * D.1375 + D.1369];
        S.0 = S.0 + 1;
      }
    L.1:;
  }
}


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31550



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list