[Bug libstdc++/31117] c++locale.o thread-unsafe in libstdc++

[bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #33 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-06 17:15 -------

>Nice idea, but I'm not sure it would work (i'm not very familiar with __thread,
>etc.): are we sure that with that kind of declaration the strtof & co functions
>themselves automatically use that new "improved" errno instead of the global
>one? 

Ack, no, they will not. So, this is a non-starter.

>Besides that, from a correctness point of view, I don't think we want to
>fail in case of underflow, other implementations behave differently from v3...

Hmm. Well, I leave this in your capable hands.

-benjamin


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31117