[Bug target/31478] Typo in sse2_umulv2siv2di3 pattern

[hjl at lucon dot org]

------- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org  2007-04-05 15:12 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > There is no corresponding define_expand for this pattern. Many define_insn
> > patterns without define_expand don't call ix86_binary_operator_ok. Will that
> > be a problem?
> 
> Those are sse builtins and are expanded via ix86_expand_binop_builtin(). This
> function fixes all operands to satisfy ix86_binary_operator_ok().
> 

So anothe word is those patterns are used by ix86_expand_binop_builtin()
and won't be generated automatically. Will be "sse2_umulv2siv2di3"
generated automatically? If yes, what makes it different from other
patterns used by ix86_expand_binop_builtin() only?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31478