[Bug libstdc++/29134] Has there been a serious attempt to define the max_size() member functions?

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #14 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-09-21 09:13 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> I like this solution a lot. NICE!
> 
> It seems as if everything is now consistent except for std::string. Any
> thoughts on that one?

basic_string is delicate, from many different points of view, as we know well,
and, at minimum, the current design cannot use the entire the full allocator'
max_size. Let's not fiddle with it. I will think about ext/vstring...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29134