[Bug c++/28408] What should be value of complex<double>(1.0,0.0) *= -1?

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-09-07 01:33 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> F.8 is *illustrative* of transformations that are *not* permitted.  It 
> doesn't permit anything.

Where do you read that in F.8.2 ?!? I read:

0 * x -> 0.0        The expressions 0 * x and 0.0 are not equivalent if
                    x is NaN, infinite, or -0

Where do you read that in all the other cases (e.g., when x is a "normal"
number) 0 * x and 0.0 are not equivalent?!?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28408