[Bug c++/28408] What should be value of complex<double>(1.0,0.0) *= -1?

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-09-06 17:11 -------
I think this difference is ultimately due to the existenxce of a separate *_O0
version of tree_lower_complex, in tree-complex.c. Rth added it (as part of
fixing 20610), I believe the generic version is right (-0), and I'm hoping he
wants to have a look to this issue...


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org,
                   |                            |pcarlini at suse dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28408