[Bug c++/29236] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with templates + friend

mark at codesourcery dot com gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Oct 10 16:23:00 GMT 2006



------- Comment #7 from mark at codesourcery dot com  2006-10-10 16:23 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with
 templates + friend

bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:

> We've been over that before, Andrew. It has always been the case that
> bugmasters do the initial triage, including setting an initial priority.
> We've done that at least back to 2002, when we were still using GNATS instead
> of bugzilla. It is also true that the RM has the prerogative to downgrade
> priorities if he doesn't deem things that important. 

I have asked that all bugs be left at P3, and that I set their initial 
priority.  I also welcome input about what the priority should be, 
ideally in the audit trail for the PR itself.  But, looking at P3 bugs 
is how I see what the new bugs are.

Thanks,


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29236



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list