[Bug c++/29236] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with templates + friend

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Comment #6 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-10-10 14:25 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> foo should not have been injected by the friend.

True, but that's irrelevant here. We get a tentative declaration that we
simply have to unify with the later real declaration.


> Note the Priority should be only changed by the release manager.

We've been over that before, Andrew. It has always been the case that
bugmasters do the initial triage, including setting an initial priority.
We've done that at least back to 2002, when we were still using GNATS instead
of bugzilla. It is also true that the RM has the prerogative to downgrade
priorities if he doesn't deem things that important. 

I maintain that it is important to raise the priority of PRs that are
rejects-valid so that they get some visibility, and in particular of
regressions. If someone higher up in the food chain thinks otherwise
wants to downgrade things, that's fine by me. But it's not productive
if bugmasters quarrel among themselves if something should be a P2 or a
P3 ...

W.


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Priority|P3                          |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29236