[Bug c++/26943] [gomp] firstprivate not working properly with non-POD

[dnovillo at redhat dot com]

------- Comment #6 from dnovillo at redhat dot com  2006-05-01 16:11 -------
Subject: Re:  [gomp] firstprivate not working properly with
 non-POD

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-01 16:07 -------
> We do need a barrier (well, in some cases with extra code we can avoid
> it in some cases), in order to honor 2.8.3.4:
> "If a list item appears in both firstprivate and lastprivate clauses, the
> update
> required for lastprivate occurs after all the initializations for
> firstprivate."
>
Ah, yes, of course.  Sorry about that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEVjMVUTa2oAUaiwQRAkViAJ4s5n62EohuFxCUWVQGZ1owtoSTcACfZR7i
NgLf43AMmOQ0xLmnl89ZkYQ=
=cjzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26943