[Bug bootstrap/26892] Can't compile a 64-bit gcc

[lucier at math dot purdue dot edu]

------- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu  2006-03-31 03:01 -------
Subject: Re:  Can't compile a 64-bit gcc

I don't know.

Why does 4.2 use libiconv and 4.1 not use it? (I'm presuming that 4.1  
doesn't use it because I was able to build a 64-bit gcc on darwin).

Should gcc ship libiconv source and compile it using BOOTCFLAGS, like  
it ends up doing with libiberty?

Brad


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26892