[Bug c/18050] -Wsequence-point reports false positives

[schwab at suse dot de]

------- Comment #9 from schwab at suse dot de  2006-03-22 13:08 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
>  i = (i += 1);
> 
> where for i += 1 the next sequence point is the i = ... assigment?

The next sequence point is the semicolon.

> Of course for the particular testcase the ordering of the two stores
> does not matter.  Would int i=0; i = ++i + 1; be able to result in
> i == 1?

Yes, the side effects of = and ++ can be performed in either order.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18050