[Bug middle-end/25815] [4.1 regression] ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-03-08 18:45 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I changed the PR component to a historically more probable one, to avoid
> blaming libstdc++, as it seems that's an conclusion you're trying to avoid.

Agreed, *as a miscompilation*, can be a regression. And, yes, I'm trying to
avoid that conclusion, because, really, the chances that something show up in
the libstdc++ side, without some help from you, a reduced testcase of sort, are
close to zero, given the evidence we have got to date. Again, in my opinion, in
such cases, it would be better to have available in Bugzilla an "unclassified"
component.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25815