[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Jun 25 15:52:00 GMT 2006
------- Comment #21 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c
execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> I looked at the documentation for lshiftrt, but it doesn't say
> whether the shift amount range handled by the PA insn for variable
> shifts is ok or not. On the otherhand, there's no obvious reason
> why we should need to support logical right shifts larger than 31
> bits and I have to wonder why the generated code does this.
I looked at this a bit more and I believe that this behavior is normal
when SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED is defined.
The test doesn't fail with -fno-unroll-loops-all-loops. It appears
to me that this is a loop unrolling rather than a loop invariant bug,
although I must admit it's not clear where things actually go wrong
because of the complexity of this operation.
I modified the testcase a bit to make debugging easier. I've attached
the modified testcase and the dumps from loop2_unroll, loop2_done, web
and cse2. The initialization of "count" in the block after code_label 21
definitely appears wrong after cse2.
I've also attached the final assembly code for reference.
Dave
------- Comment #22 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11748)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11748&action=view)
------- Comment #23 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11749)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11749&action=view)
------- Comment #24 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11750)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11750&action=view)
------- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11751)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11751&action=view)
------- Comment #26 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11752)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11752&action=view)
------- Comment #27 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11753)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11753&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26244
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list