build problem...

Thomas Fitzsimmons fitzsim@redhat.com
Thu Jun 15 20:04:00 GMT 2006


Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 14:14 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> I assume I'm not the only one seeing this build failure:
>>
>>
>> make[5]: Entering directory `/build/gcc/2006-06-15/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/tools'
>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link /build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/xgcc -B/build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include  -O2 -g -O2    -o gappletviewer -L/install/gcc/lib -lgcj gappletviewer-toolwrapper.o
>> /build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/xgcc -B/build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 -g -O2 -o gappletviewer gappletviewer-toolwrapper.o  -L/install/gcc/lib -lgcj
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcj
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[5]: *** [gappletviewer] Error 1
> 
> Thank you Tom.. :-)

:-(

This patch of mine:

2006-06-13  Thomas Fitzsimmons  <fitzsim@redhat.com>

	* configure: Regenerate.
	* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
	* configure.ac (--enable-plugin): New option.
	(ac_configure_args): Add --enable-tool-wrappers.
	(ac_configure_args): Add --disable-plugin unless --enable-plugin
	was specified.
	* gcj/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
	* sources.am (gnu_java_net_source_files): Add
	classpath/gnu/java/net/IndexListParser.java.
	(property_files): Remove
	...

caused a bootstrap failure on multilib architectures.  A clean bootstrap did 
work for me on my x86 workstation, but I hadn't cleared out $prefix.  I have a 
suspicion that the libjava configury reaches into $prefix during the bootstrap. 
  In the future I'll be sure to clear $prefix before bootstrapping, and I'll 
also bootstrap on a multilib architecture (x86-64).

Sorry for the inconvenience.  For now I've reverted the part of the patch that 
was causing the failure.

Tom



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list