[Bug middle-end/25957] -fstack-protector code on i386/x86-64 can be improved.

[ak at muc dot de]

------- Comment #2 from ak at muc dot de  2006-01-25 14:15 -------
You're wrong. On i386 and x86-64 call and conditional jumps have the same 
range.

That you're using the normal align-jumps for such uncommon code is a bug in my
opinion and that is why I opened this request. It is a waste of space
for code that is known to be uncommon at compile time like this.

The debugging argument seems bogus in this case too. You'll see the
original function in the backtrace, but that is ok here.


-- 

ak at muc dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25957