[Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors

[hhinnant at apple dot com]

------- Comment #13 from hhinnant at apple dot com  2006-01-25 03:24 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> | Did you read comment 3? 
> 
> Yes.  Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or
> not does not matter? 

No.  My suspicion is that there is a 99.99% chance that EDG is conforming to
C++03 in this regard.  And furthermore, their behavior (which is different from
ours) is preferable to our customers.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950