[Bug libstdc++/25649] [4.2 regression] Bogus "uninitialized" warning

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-24 18:27 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Andrew, please stop saying stupid things. If you can support your claims with
> the library chapters of the standards, ok, otherwise please spend time on
> something else.

What does the standard have to do with this bug?  I don't get it.  Checking if
the "cin >> x" failed is standard practice in fact encouraged by the standard.

If you look at my example in comment #9, it shows that we set the variable x if
that fails but we get a warning still as the middle-end does not know what the
library is doing behinds it back.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25649