[Bug c++/25826] "pure virtual" destructors accepted by GCC, but cause link failure

[lloyd at randombit dot net]

------- Comment #6 from lloyd at randombit dot net  2006-01-17 21:39 -------
Thank you for the reference Gaby. I'm now not quite sure what purpose a pure
virtual destructor has, or why it should be legal, but neither the apparent
language oddity nor my confusion about same is a GCC problem, so... Andrew,
Gaby, sorry to distract you with the invalid bug report. I'll check the
standard first next time.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25826