[Bug c++/25649] [4.2 regression] Bogus "uninitialized" warning

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-01-04 15:08 -------
(In reply to comment #3)

> We really don't set __n in all cases here.

And indeed we do *not* want to set __n in all cases: if for some reason the
extraction fails __n *must* be left untouched. Per the standard, there isn't
any doubt about that and note that before my patch the net behavior was
*exactly* the same, only, for some reason, the warning was not emitted.


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|libstdc++                   |c++


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25649