[Bug tree-optimization/17687] sincos expansion is suboptimal

[bonzini at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2006-08-10 08:32 -------
sure, but t1 and t2 die the moment they are assigned back.  it would be just a
trick to return in memory, but not make s and c addressable all the way down to
RA.

though i don't remember how big a penalty is if your variable is addressable
just for the sake of one or two uses.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687