[Bug tree-optimization/23604] [4.1 Regression] wrong code due to VRP

[dnovillo at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com  2005-09-30 13:27 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1 Regression] wrong code due to VRP

On September 30, 2005 09:24, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> 2005-09-30 13:24 ------- Jim's patch certainly worked for me.  But
> the question is if we can do more. If not anti-range and
> limit_vr->min == limit_vr->max, then we at least can create
> anti-range from TYPE_MIN_VALUE to TYPE_MAX_VALUE.

Right.  That's what I'm trying to determine ATM.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23604