[Bug libstdc++/24061] Documentation in /tr1/hashtable proposes possibly misleading change

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-09-26 10:03 -------
To be clear: my impression is that the resolution of DR130 was dictated by and
large by consistency and that the current wording for the iterator returned by
erase would be Ok also for unordered containers (besides all the other 
containers).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24061