[Bug libstdc++/23767] std::vector iterator implementation wrong

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-09-07 20:26 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you add a third argument to the constructor, don't you somehow have to 
> add the old constructor with its two-argument signature to the library to 
> allow old programs to link against the new library? 

Why? As far as I can see there are *no* instantiations of the iterator 
class inside the library proper (*.so or *.a). 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23767