[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

[mark at codesourcery dot com]

------- Comment #8 from mark at codesourcery dot com  2005-10-02 21:21 -------
Subject: Re:  solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> However, there is a bigger issue involved, which is still in progress. Actually,
> I'd like to broaden this out a bit since it looks like we are thinking of
> solving a related issue on linux as well. (See RH bugzilla, link below)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165728
> 
> Therefore, I'm suggesting I close this, and open a more general enhancement bug.

Sure, that sounds fine.

My opinion is that, even if it means a small performance hit, we should
move the weak declarations of pthread_* out of headers that can be
included in user code.  I understand that would be an ABI change, but
you're working on a new libstdc++ ABI, so you could do it there.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24071