------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:41 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed. Reminds a bit of PR 15809. > Oh woe is me! Unfortunately it is not the same. OK, I am onto it..... Paul T -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24789