[Bug c++/24847] Instantiates un-called copy constructor

Wed Nov 23 05:21:00 GMT 2005


------- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2005-11-23 05:21 -------
The second constructor is definitely bogus, but its mere existence 
does no harm. We should only perform the check for sensibility when
we actually instantiate the second constructor.

W.


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-11-23 05:21:00
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24847