[Bug libfortran/24903] dotprod should use conj?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 22:53 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm ready to do that, but since complex numbers in C are always a pain, I 
> want to know: are we sure that conj/conjf/conjl are *always* available? I
> mean, are they part of the things gcc provides even if there is no library
> support for them in the runtime libm?

Hmm, I have to think about that but you can always use the GCC extension :) as
mentioned before.

I think the builtin version of conj/conjf/conjl
(__builtin_conj/__builtin_conjf/__builtin_conjl) is always expanded to
CONJ_EXPR but I could be wrong.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24903