------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 16:19 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Ups. That's what I was trying to suggest - an unusual typo isn't it? ;-)
> Thanks for taking care of this!
Actually I was wrong in saying that only complex modes can show up here. It
can also show up in the mixed 64/32 bit of PPC for 64bit ints (powerpc-darwin
is the target).
(call_insn 8 6 9 (parallel [
(set (parallel:DI [
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:SI 3 r3)
(const_int 0 [0x0]))
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:SI 4 r4)
(const_int 4 [0x4]))
])
(call (mem:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("f") [flags 0x41] <function_decl
0x2aaaab0a6e00 f>) [0 S4 A8])
(const_int 32 [0x20])))
(use (const_int 0 [0x0]))
(clobber (scratch:SI))
]) -1 (nil)
(nil)
(nil))
You most likely can construct an ICE for that testcase too but I don't really
know how.
The testcase to get that construct is:
long long f(void);
int g(void)
{
return f();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823